Role matrix with multi-role assignment

Decision fieldRecord or rule
Primary offeringwhat the buyer can obtain directly.
Enabling rolewhat the organization supplies to another participant.
Channel rolehow it reaches or serves buyers.
W06-02 · EVIDENCE TO DECISION01Primary offering02Enabling role03Channel role
  1. 01Primary offering
  2. 02Enabling role
  3. 03Channel role
Original 1000&1 decision worksheet for this article; the labels below define each part.

Assign roles per activity, not per logo

A participant may build technology, distribute another product and provide implementation services. One fixed “vendor type” can hide this. Use a role matrix keyed to the value-chain activity, with evidence for each assignment and an explicit unknown state. A buyer comparing products and an analyst studying the ecosystem may need different views of the same entity.

  1. Choose roles based on the value chain relevant to the buyer task.
  2. Allow several roles when separate sources support them.
  3. Retain the source and time for each role so changes are reviewable.

Review multi-role conflicts

In a technology Market, an integration partner may also compete with the integrated product. That is not a data error; it is a relationship that needs a time and context. Keep the participant identity stable while role edges change. Avoid inferring a commercial partnership from a shared mention or a logo: a public integration page and a verified partner claim carry different meanings.

A multi-role participant example

A technology company may publish a product, integrate another platform and offer implementation services. Each role answers a different question and may have a different source. The Market profile keeps one entity identity while its role matrix records three assertions. If the integration ends, only that relation is retired. A fixed single “company type” would either hide the change or force duplicate profiles. Explicit multi-role assignment makes the ecosystem more accurate without pretending that every commercial relationship is known.

A shared mention is not a partnership

Do not infer a partnership merely because two brands appear on the same page. Record only attributable relationships.

References and source notes

Original 1000&1 methodology reviewed and approved by the author. Public claims and historical measurements are bounded by the linked sources and dates.